Kubernetes vs. Docker Compose: 5 Key Differences and How to Choose

What Is Kubernetes? {#what-is-kubernetes}

Kubernetes is an open-source platform designed to automate deploying, scaling, and managing containerized applications. It groups containers that make up an application into logical units called pods, enabling easy management and discovery.

Kubernetes was originally developed by Google to manage huge numbers of containers running in its data centers. It helped solve the problem of manual deployment and scaling of applications, which was time-consuming and prone to errors. Today, Kubernetes is maintained by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation.

One of the key benefits of Kubernetes is its scalability. It allows you to automatically or manually scale your applications based on resource usage like CPU and memory, or custom metrics defined by your teams. Kubernetes also offers a high level of fault tolerance by constantly checking the health of nodes and containers.

What Is Docker Compose? {#what-is-docker-compose}

Docker Compose, part of the open source Docker platform is a tool for defining and running multi-container applications. With Compose, you use a YAML file to configure your application’s services, and then, with a single command, you create and start all the services from your configuration.

Docker Compose was created to simplify the process of running multiple containers as a single service. For example, suppose you have an application that requires a web server, a database, and a Redis cache. In that case, you can define and manage all these services using Docker Compose, ensuring that they are isolated and work together.

Docker Compose is particularly beneficial for development and testing environments where you need to repeatedly pull up and tear down multi-container applications. It’s also useful for continuous integration workflows and development environments where you need to manage multiple services on a single host.

This is part of a series of articles docker container.

• [Kubernetes vs. Docker Compose: How to Choose?]

Kubernetes vs. Docker Compose: 5 Key Differences

1. Scalability and Orchestration

Kubernetes is known for its robust scalability features. It allows you to scale applications automatically, both vertically (by adding more resources to a pod on the same machine) or horizontally (by deploying pods on more machines). This is especially beneficial for applications with fluctuating traffic demands. Kubernetes’ ability to handle large-scale deployments makes it a preferred choice for big enterprises.

Docker Compose is more suitable for smaller deployments. While it does offer a basic scaling feature (the --scale flag) it does not offer any of the sophisticated auto-scaling capabilities that Kubernetes does. Thus, it is less suitable for production environments.

The orchestration capabilities of both platforms also differ significantly. Kubernetes is a full-fledged orchestration platform, enabling you to manage, scale, and deploy containerized applications efficiently. In contrast, Docker Compose is a simple tool that allows you to define and manage multi-container Docker applications.

2. Multi-Node Clusters

A multi-node cluster consists of multiple interconnected nodes, and managing these clusters efficiently is important for application reliability, performance, and cost optimization.

Kubernetes excels at managing multi-node clusters. It allows you to manage complex applications spread across multiple nodes with ease. Kubernetes is very robust and can manage clusters with thousands of nodes. It also provides a feature known as Kubernetes Federation, which lets you manage multiple clusters as if they were a single entity.

Docker Compose is not designed to handle multi-node clusters. It works best with single-node setups. For a small project or to develop an application, Docker Compose might serve well, but for larger deployments spread across multiple nodes, Kubernetes is more appropriate.

3. Load Balancing

Kubernetes comes with built-in load balancing features. It automatically distributes network traffic to ensure efficient use of resources. Kubernetes’ service abstraction layer provides basic load balancing, automatically distributing network traffic to the right pods. The Kubernetes Ingress component, which has been implemented by vendors like NGINX and HAProxy, supports more complex load balancing requirements.

Docker Compose does not provide automatic load balancing. You would need to set up and configure a separate load balancer when using Docker Compose. This additional setup makes Docker Compose less convenient for handling large-scale deployments compared to Kubernetes.

4. Self Healing

One of the significant advantages of cloud native applications is the ability to heal themselves. Self-healing containers can automatically restart when they fail, replace themselves when they’re not responding, and kill containers that don’t meet the user-defined conditions.

Kubernetes has self-healing capabilities. It continuously monitors the health of containers and takes necessary actions in case of failures. If a container fails, Kubernetes will automatically restart it. Similarly, if a pod fails, Kubernetes automatically restarts it, and if a node goes down, Kubernetes will reschedule pods to other nodes. These capabilities make Kubernetes a reliable choice for production environments.

Docker Compose lacks self-healing features. If a container fails in Docker Compose, it won’t automatically restart. You’ll need to manually handle such situations, which can be time-consuming and less reliable.

5. Community and Ecosystem

Kubernetes is backed by a large community of developers, enterprises, and contributors. As a CNCF (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) project, it has widespread industry support and a growing ecosystem of third-party tools and extensions.

Docker Compose is developed by the Docker open source community and its corporate sponsors. However, as a specific feature within the Docker platform, it receives less attention and has far less contributors than Kubernetes. There are also fewer third-party integrations and tools specifically designed for Docker Compose compared to Kubernetes.

In terms of documentation and tutorials, both have strong resources available. However, Kubernetes offers more avenues for community support, including forums, online courses, and conferences dedicated solely to Kubernetes and its associated technologies.

Related content: Read our guide to docker vs Kubernetes (coming soon)

Kubernetes vs. Docker Compose: How to Choose?

The choice of Kubernetes or Docker Compose will depend on your specific needs and requirements. If you need a robust, scalable, and powerful platform for managing large-scale, complex applications, Kubernetes would be the right choice. Its advanced features like service discovery, load balancing, and multi-node cluster management, along with the strong community backing, make it a reliable choice for large production environments.

On the other hand, if you’re working with small-scale applications or in development environments, Docker Compose could be a better fit. Its simplicity and straightforwardness make it useful for developers who want to quickly define and run multi-container applications without the need for complex configurations or advanced features.

Run Containers and Kubernetes in Seconds with Acorn

Get started with a free Acorn account by clicking here and check out the Acorn catalog to launch one of our many pre-built apps.